Pular para o conteúdo
English for ALL
← Todas as questões

ITA 2012 – questão 3: empatia, bullying e as causas de fundo

THURSDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2010. Newsweek Article: Bullying and Empathy (Kate Altman, M.S.)

Newsweek offers an article on how schools are using empathy- training programs in an effort to reduce bullying in schools: http://www.newsweek.com/2010/12/15/can-schools-teach-kids- not-to-bully.html

1 The effective_____ of such programs is unclear at this point,

and experts are divided on whether it makes more sense to offer the

programs to young children (elementary school age) or older children

(middle school age) (both, is probably the answer). High school kids

5 are simply difficult to reach logistically, since they all have different

schedules all day. Unsurprisingly, some experts have found that the

most important component to empathy training is to include the

parents.

In assessing these programs and the broader issues of

10 empathy-training and bullying, there are multiple factors to consider

and no clear answers. First of all, empathy is one of the most difficult

and least-understood skills we can develop – adults and kids alike.

Empathy is the process of viewing and understanding the world

through another’s experience, and it is often confused with sympathy,

15 which is, essentially, compassion and lacks the “walking in another’s

shoes” component (which is not to say it is not an admirable trait, it’s

just different from empathy). Developmentally, children may not be

able to truly understand and practice empathy until they are closer to

the pre-teen years, but introducing the concept early and often is a

20 good primer for its later development.

Another big question to consider: are programs focused on

empathy simply band-aids on much larger, more systemic problems?

Why are kids bullying other kids in the first place? What family issues,

societal issues, educational issues, are contributing to the need/urge

25 to humiliate and attack other children for some sort of personal gain

and satisfaction? My guess is that for many kids, participating in a

brief (or even a few brief) empathy-skills seminars simply is not

enough, and will not get at the root(s) of the problems(s), no matter

how young they are when the programs begin.

30 I’m not saying that the programs are not a good idea. I

imagine that they have a lot of benefits and could especially help kids

who would not necessarily be bullies themselves, but may have

quietly stood by while witnessing bullying, to become more confident

about standing up to/reporting bullies. However, to truly reduce

35 bullying, society and schools need to find ways to identify and work

with aggressive children and their families from a young age — to

troubleshoot factors (from not having basic needs met, to divorce, to

models of aggression in the home, etc.) that contribute to triggering

aggressive behavior. Such an approach would be expensive and time-

40 consuming and would command a lot of schools’ resources, but it is

hard to imagine a more lightweight approach being nearly as effective.

Segundo o texto,

  1. A) é difícil incluir os alunos de ensino médio nos empathy training programs, por serem mais velhos e demandarem uma abordagem diferenciada.
  2. B) o componente mais importante na empatia é a relação familiar.
  3. C) simpatia está estritamente relacionada à empatia.
  4. D) é inútil trabalhar o conceito de empatia anteriormente à pré-adolescência.
  5. E) há, provavelmente, fatores mais determinantes para a prática de bullying do que a falta de empatia.
Ver gabarito comentado

Resposta correta: E

A autora põe em dúvida a suficiência dos programas de empatia justamente por supor causas mais profundas: "are programs focused on empathy simply band-aids on much larger, more systemic problems? Why are kids bullying other kids in the first place? What family issues, societal issues, educational issues, are contributing to the need/urge to humiliate and attack other children…" — é o que a alternativa E resume. A alternativa A distorce o texto: os alunos de ensino médio são difíceis de alcançar "logistically, since they all have different schedules all day", e não por serem mais velhos ou exigirem abordagem diferenciada. C confunde os conceitos que o texto separa, já que a simpatia "lacks the 'walking in another's shoes' component". D contraria "introducing the concept early and often is a good primer for its later development", e B troca "the most important component to empathy training", que é incluir os pais, por uma vaga "relação familiar" como componente da própria empatia.

Questões relacionadas

Ver todas →

B2 Interpretação de texto Reportagem

Atividade física como questão climática de saúde pública (PUC Minas Medicina 2026)
READ THE FOLLOWING TEXT AND CHOOSE THE OPTION WHICH BEST COMPLETES EACH QUESTION ACCORDING TO THE TEXT: HEALTH AND CLIMATE Rising temperatures are making physical activity undesirable and even dangerous in many parts of the world, and as global heating worsens…

By reading the text we can conclude that

Resolver questão

B2 Interpretação de texto Reportagem

Renda, calor e inatividade física (PUC Minas Medicina 2026)
READ THE FOLLOWING TEXT AND CHOOSE THE OPTION WHICH BEST COMPLETES EACH QUESTION ACCORDING TO THE TEXT: HEALTH AND CLIMATE Rising temperatures are making physical activity undesirable and even dangerous in many parts of the world, and as global heating worsens…

By reading the text we can infer that

Resolver questão

B2 Interpretação de texto Artigo de divulgação científica

Ideia principal do texto sobre solidão positiva (PUC Minas Medicina 2025)
READ THE FOLLOWING TEXT AND CHOOSE THE OPTION WHICH BEST COMPLETES EACH QUESTION ACCORDING TO THE TEXT: The benefits of positive solitude Over the past few years, experts have been sounding the alarm over how much time Americans spend alone. Statistics show th…

What is the main idea of the text?

Resolver questão