Pular para o conteúdo
English for ALL
← Todas as questões

Comparando os quatro estudos sobre percepção facial (ITA 2016)

1 Your Facial Bone Structure Has a Big Influence on How People See You

2

3 (…) Selfies, headshots, mug shots — photos of oneself convey more these days than snapshots ever did back in

4 the Kodak era. Most digitally minded people continually post and update pictures of themselves at professional, social

5 media and dating sites such as LinkedIn, Facebook, Match.com and Tinder. For better or worse, viewers then tend to

6 make snap judgments about someone’s personality or character from a single shot. As such, it can be a stressful task to

7 select the photo that conveys the best impression of ourselves. For those of us seeking to appear friendly and trustworthy

8 to others, a new study underscores an old, chipper piece of advice: Put on a happy face.

9 A newly published series of experiments by cognitive neuroscientists at New York University is reinforcing the

10 relevance of facial expressions to perceptions of characteristics such as trustworthiness and friendliness. More

11 importantly, the research also revealed the unexpected finding that perceptions of abilities such as physical strength are

12 not dependent on facial expressions but rather on facial bone structure.

13 The team’s first experiment featured photographs of 10 different people presenting five different facial expressions

14 each. Study subjects rated how friendly, trustworthy or strong the person in each photo appeared. A separate group of

15 subjects scored each face on an emotional scale from “very angry” to “very happy.” And three experts not involved in

16 either of the previous two ratings to avoid confounding results calculated the facial width-to-height ratio for each face. An

17 analysis revealed that participants generally ranked people with a happy expression as friendly and trustworthy but not

18 those with angry expressions. Surprisingly, participants did not rank faces as indicative of physical strength based on

19 facial expression but graded faces that were very broad as that of a strong individual.

20 In a second survey facial expression and facial structure were manipulated in computer-generated faces.

21 Participants rated each face for the same traits as in the first survey, with the addition of a rating for warmth. Again,

22 people thought a happy expression, but not an angry one, indicated friendliness, trustworthiness — and in this case,

23 warmth. The researchers then showed two additional sets of participants the same faces, this time either with areas

24 relevant to facial expressions obscured or the width cropped. In the first variation, for faces lacking emotional cues,

25 people could no longer perceive personality traits but could still perceive strength based on width. Similarly, for those

26 faces lacking structural cues, people could no longer perceive strength but could still perceive personality traits based on

27 facial expressions.

28 In a third iteration of the survey participants had to pick four faces out of a lineup of eight faces varied for

29 expression and width that they might select either as their financial advisor or as the winner of a power-lifting competition.

30 As might be expected, participants picked faces with happier expressions as financial advisors and selected broader

31 faces as belonging to power-lifting champs.

32 In a final survey the researchers generated more than 100 variations of one individual “base face” by varying facial

33 features. Participants saw two faces at a time, and then picked one as either trustworthy or high in ability or as a good

34 financial advisor or power-lifting winner. Using these results, a computer then created an average face for each of these

35 four categories, which were shown to a separate set of participants who had to pick which face appeared either more

36 trustworthy or stronger. Most of the participants found the computer-generated averages to be good representations of

37 trustworthiness or strength — and generally saw the average “financial advisor” face as more trustworthy and the “power-

38 lifter” face as stronger. The findings from all four surveys were published in the Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

39 on June 18.

Adaptado de www.scientific.american.com/article/your-facial-bone-strecture-has-a-big-influence-on-how-people-see-you.(acesso em 20/8/2015)

Fonte: Scientific American.

Considere as sentenças a seguir: I. O primeiro estudo foi realizado com um grupo de 10 participantes e 3 avaliadores. II. O segundo estudo ampliou o primeiro, incluindo a avaliação sobre afetuosidade. III. O terceiro estudo calculou a força física pela razão entre altura e largura da face. IV. O quarto estudo utilizou as mesmas imagens do primeiro estudo. Está(ão) correta(as)

  1. A) apenas I e IV.
  2. B) apenas a II.
  3. C) apenas II e III.
  4. D) apenas II e IV.
  5. E) apenas a IV.
Ver gabarito comentado

Resposta correta: B

Só a afirmativa II tem apoio literal: “Participants rated each face for the same traits as in the first survey, with the addition of a rating for warmth” — o segundo estudo repete o primeiro e acrescenta a avaliação de afetuosidade. A I confunde quem é quem: o primeiro experimento usou fotos de “10 different people presenting five different facial expressions each”, ou seja, dez pessoas fotografadas, além de dois grupos de avaliadores e de três especialistas; não foram dez participantes. A III desloca o cálculo de lugar, porque a razão largura-altura foi medida no primeiro estudo, e o terceiro apenas pediu que se escolhessem quatro rostos entre oito para os papéis de “financial advisor” ou “power-lifting competition”. A IV também falha: o quarto estudo gerou “more than 100 variations of one individual base face”, imagens novas, e não as fotografias do primeiro.

Questões relacionadas

Ver todas →

C1 Interpretação de texto Artigo de opinião

Ideia principal do artigo “It’s neither artificial, nor intelligent” (ITA 2026)
Leia o texto a seguir para responder às questões 46 a 48. The problem with artificial intelligence? It’s neither artificial, nor intelligent. Elon Musk and Apple’s co-founder Steve Wozniak have recently signed a letter calling for a six-month moratorium on the…

The sentence that BEST summarizes the main idea of the text is

Resolver questão

C1 Interpretação de texto Editorial

ITA 2026: o declínio da leitura entre adolescentes
Leia o texto a seguir para responder às questões 40 e 41. The decline of teenagers reading is an impact on education If you are a teenager reading this story, you are in the minority. Statistics show that 80% of teenagers do not read for pleasure on a daily ba…

De acordo com as informações do texto, é CORRETO afirmar que

Resolver questão

C1 Interpretação de texto Reportagem

ITA 2025 – Quais asserções sobre detecção de textos de IA são verdadeiras
As scientists explore AI-written text, journals hammer out policies Many ask authors to disclose use of ChatGPT and other generative artificial intelligence “It’s all we’ve been talking about since November,” says Patrick Franzen, publishing director for SPIE,…

Leia as asserções destacadas e, em seguida, assinale a alternativa CORRETA. I. Pesquisadores acostumados a ler artigos de periódicos médicos não conseguem compreender um terço das publicações. II. Por ora, editores e revisores de publicações científicas têm dificuldades para iden- tificar, de forma consistente, textos gerados por IA dada a escassez de softwares especializados. III. Responsáveis por publicações científicas estão relutantes em coibir o uso de geradores de texto por computador, temendo uma potencial enxurrada de críticas por parte da comunidade acadêmica. IV. A publicação de prospectos gerados por IA, contendo novas versões de alguns artigos científicos específicos, causou uma onda de choque na indústria editorial acadêmica.

Resolver questão