Pular para o conteúdo
English for ALL
← Todas as questões

A estupidez é inevitável? A afirmação incorreta (ITA 2022)

Stupidity permeates our perception and practice of politics. We frequently accuse politicians, bureaucrats, journalists, voters, “elites,” and “the masses” for their stupidities. In fact, it is not only “populist politicians,” “sensational journalism,” and “uneducated voters” who are accused of stupidity. Similar accusations can be, and in fact have been, made concerning those who criticize them as well. It seems that stupidity is ubiquitous, unable to be contained within or attributed to one specific political position, personal trait, or even ignorance and erroneous reasoning. Undertaking a theoretical investigation of stupidity, Nabutaka Otobe challenges the assumption that stupidity can be avoided. The author argues that the very ubiquity of stupidity implies its unavoidability — that we cannot contain it in such domains as error, ignorance, or “post-truth.” What we witness is rather that one’s reasoning can be sound, evidence-based, and stupid. In revealing this unavoidability, he contends that stupidity is an ineluctable problem not only of politics, but also of thinking. We become stupid because we think: it is impossible to distinguish a priori stupid thought from upright, righteous thought. Moreover, the failure to address the unavoidability of stupidity leads political theory to the failure to acknowledge the productive moments that experiences of stupidity harbor within. Such productive moments constitute the potential of stupidity — that radical new ideas can emerge out of our seemingly banal and stupid thinking in our daily political activity. Fonte: https://www.routledge.com/. Publicado em 12/10/2020. Acesso em 20/08/2021.

Fonte: Routledge, 2020-10-12.

De acordo com o texto, não é correto afirmar que

  1. A) em nossa prática política diária, novas ideias radicais podem surgir de um pensamento aparentemente banal e estúpido.
  2. B) o fracasso em considerarmos que a estupidez é inevitável nos conduz a outro malogro.
  3. C) a ubiquidade da estupidez implica em sua evitabilidade.
  4. D) a estupidez não pode ser contida em domínios como ignorância, erro ou pós-verdade.
  5. E) a estupidez é um problema do pensamento do qual não podemos escapar.
Ver gabarito comentado

Resposta correta: C

A questão pede o que NÃO está correto. O texto afirma o contrário de C: “The author argues that the very ubiquity of stupidity implies its unavoidability”, ou seja, a onipresença da estupidez implica sua inevitabilidade, e não sua evitabilidade — por isso C é o gabarito. O mesmo período sustenta D, com “we cannot contain it in such domains as error, ignorance, or ‘post-truth’”. E se apoia em “stupidity is an ineluctable problem not only of politics, but also of thinking”. B, que poderia parecer vaga, corresponde a “the failure to address the unavoidability of stupidity leads political theory to the failure to acknowledge the productive moments”, e A reproduz o fecho “radical new ideas can emerge out of our seemingly banal and stupid thinking”.

Questões relacionadas

Ver todas →

C2 Interpretação de texto Ensaio

ITA 2026: o progresso do conhecimento humano em Van Doren
Leia o texto a seguir para responder às questões 37 a 39. The voluminous literature dealing with the idea of human progress is decidedly a mixed bag. While some of these writings are impressive and even inspiring, many of them are superficial, perhaps even rid…

The sentence which describes an idea which is NOT in the text is

Resolver questão

C2 Interpretação de texto Editorial

O culto à mediocridade em editorial de 1862
It is the standing reproach of a democratic society that it is the purgatory of genius and the paradise of mediocrity. With ourselves it has become notorious that when a man is so unfortunate as to exhibit uncommon abilities, he usually renders himself ineligi…

De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, é correto afirmar que:

Resolver questão

C2 Interpretação de texto Editorial

Demagogos e a igualdade sentida com a plateia (ITA 2021)
It is the standing reproach of a democratic society that it is the purgatory of genius and the paradise of mediocrity. With ourselves it has become notorious that when a man is so unfortunate as to exhibit uncommon abilities, he usually renders himself ineligi…

No trecho destacado, extraído do segundo parágrafo, “It is found to perfection in the speeches of demagogues, who feel certain they are never so successful as when their audience is satisfied that the intellect of the speaker is of no higher an order than that of the lowest intelligence among them.”, a ideia principal é a de que:

Resolver questão