Pular para o conteúdo
English for ALL
← Todas as questões

ITA 2026: o progresso do conhecimento humano em Van Doren

Leia o texto a seguir para responder às questões 37 a 39.

The voluminous literature dealing with the idea of human progress is decidedly a mixed bag. While some of these writings are impressive and even inspiring, many of them are superficial, perhaps even ridiculous, in their reiteration (especially during the nineteenth century) of the comforting prospect that every day in every way we are growing better and better.

This kind of foolishness is manifested especially in discussions of such matters as economic, political, and moral progress, and of progress in art.[…]

From time to time, there seems to be real and measurable improvement in these areas. At other times the opposite seems equally to be the case. Thus the fervent belief of writers like the French sociophilosopher Auguste Comte in the inevitability of progress in all fields of human endeavor must be viewed as insupportable. We cannot accept it any longer, even if we once thought it was true.

Progress in human knowledge is another matter. Here it is possible to argue cogently that progress is in the nature of things. “Not only does each individual progress from day to day”, wrote French philosopher, mathematician, and mystic Blaise Pascal, “but mankind as a whole constantly progresses… in proportion as the universe grows older.” The essence of man as a rational being, as a later historian would put it, is that he develops his potential capacities by accumulating the experience of past generations.

Just as in our individual lives we learn more and more from day to day and from year to year because we remember some at least of what we have learned and add our new knowledge to it, so in the history of the race the collective memory retains at least some knowledge from the past to which is added every new discovery.

The memories of individuals fail and the persons die, but the memory of the race is eternal, or at least it can be expected to endure as long as human beings continue to write books and read them, or – which becomes more and more common – store up their knowledge in other mediums for the use of future generations.

Fonte: VAN DOREN, Charles. A History of Knowledge. Past, Present and Future. New York. The Random House Publishing Group. 1991, p. XV-XVI.

Fonte: A History of Knowledge: Past, Present and Future, de Charles Van Doren (Random House), 1991.

The sentence which describes an idea which is NOT in the text is

  1. A) the inevitability of progress in human knowledge stems from humanity's ability to retain and build upon past learning.
  2. B) the preservation of knowledge through books and other media ensures the continuity of intellectual progress across generations.
  3. C) many writings on human progress overly romanticize the idea that humanity is constantly improving in all aspects.
  4. D) human knowledge inconsistently advances through accumulated experience and preserved collective memory.
  5. E) individual and humanity progress heighten as experience and knowledge are accumulated.
Ver gabarito comentado

Resposta correta: D

A questão pede a ideia que NÃO está no texto. Van Doren separa dois domínios: quanto a economia, política, moral e arte, “From time to time, there seems to be real and measurable improvement in these areas. At other times the opposite seems equally to be the case”; quanto ao saber, “Progress in human knowledge is another matter. Here it is possible to argue cogently that progress is in the nature of things.” O avanço do conhecimento é, portanto, apresentado como cumulativo e constante, o que torna falsa a alternativa D, que o descreve como inconstante (“inconsistently advances”). As demais têm respaldo direto: a memória coletiva “retains at least some knowledge from the past to which is added every new discovery” (A e E) e dura enquanto houver livros ou outros meios de armazenamento (B); e a crítica ao otimismo ingênuo de que “every day in every way we are growing better and better” sustenta C.

Questões relacionadas

Ver todas →

C2 Interpretação de texto Texto de divulgacao

A estupidez é inevitável? A afirmação incorreta (ITA 2022)
Stupidity permeates our perception and practice of politics. We frequently accuse politicians, bureaucrats, journalists, voters, “elites,” and “the masses” for their stupidities. In fact, it is not only “populist politicians,” “sensational journalism,” and “un…

De acordo com o texto, não é correto afirmar que

Resolver questão

C2 Interpretação de texto Editorial

O culto à mediocridade em editorial de 1862
It is the standing reproach of a democratic society that it is the purgatory of genius and the paradise of mediocrity. With ourselves it has become notorious that when a man is so unfortunate as to exhibit uncommon abilities, he usually renders himself ineligi…

De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, é correto afirmar que:

Resolver questão

C2 Interpretação de texto Editorial

Demagogos e a igualdade sentida com a plateia (ITA 2021)
It is the standing reproach of a democratic society that it is the purgatory of genius and the paradise of mediocrity. With ourselves it has become notorious that when a man is so unfortunate as to exhibit uncommon abilities, he usually renders himself ineligi…

No trecho destacado, extraído do segundo parágrafo, “It is found to perfection in the speeches of demagogues, who feel certain they are never so successful as when their audience is satisfied that the intellect of the speaker is of no higher an order than that of the lowest intelligence among them.”, a ideia principal é a de que:

Resolver questão